Kamala Harris has just argued that once President Trump leaves office he should be prosecuted by the justice department for obstruction of justice and she would make sure it is done if she is elected President.
In stating that Trump should be prosecuted Harris just indirectly argued that former Attorney General Eric Holder and former President Barack Obama should be investigated and prosecuted for obstruction of justice right along with her own self.
www.npr.org/2019/06/08/730941386/harris-justice-dept-would-have-no-choice-but-to-prosecute-trump-after-presidency
In stating that Trump should be prosecuted Harris just indirectly argued that former Attorney General Eric Holder and former President Barack Obama should be investigated and prosecuted for obstruction of justice right along with her own self.
www.npr.org/2019/06/08/730941386/harris-justice-dept-would-have-no-choice-but-to-prosecute-trump-after-presidency
For details go to:
1) https://barack-the-betrayer-obama.weebly.com/
2) https://judgelucykoh.weebly.com/
3) https://michaelgennacooir.weebly.com/
While Attorney General I contacted Kamala Harris to hold police officers accountable for violating numerous state laws including excessive force, (police brutality), and then who covered up their crimes by editing and falsifying audio/video recordings and taser gun activation data which is also against the law. Kamala Harris refused to hold the officers accountable for the crimes despite the overwhelming evidence which proves beyond a reasonable doubt they committed the crimes.
Sen. Kamala Harris ignored pleas from her staff to institute a defendants’ rights policy while she served as district attorney of San Francisco, according to a new report in The Wall Street Journal.
According to the report, Harris took no action on memorandums written by her aides in 2005 proposing that her office institute a written policy for disclosing police misconduct to defendants. The disclosures, known as “Brady disclosures” after the 1963 Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, were opposed by police unions. Harris ultimately enacted a Brady disclosure policy years later, but only after a 2010 scandal involving her office’s failure to disclose information to defendants led to the dismissal of 1,000 drug-related cases. Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo criticized Harris at the time for failing to “disclose information that should have been disclosed.” |
The report sheds new light on Harris’ record as a prosecutor and could pose problems for the California lawmaker as she seeks the Democratic nomination for president. Harris has faced scrutiny for her tough-on-crime tactics as attorney general of California and San Francisco district attorney.
Harris responded to that criticism in a speech in South Carolina over the weekend.
“There have been those who have questioned my motivations, my beliefs and what I have done,” Harris said. “But my mother used to say, you don’t let people tell you who you are. You tell them who you are. So that’s what I’m gonna do.”
A Harris spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment from CNBC. Her campaign told the Journal, “It took too long to implement, but I am proud we implemented a Brady policy in the D.A.‘s office that was later called ‘a model for other jurisdictions.’”
Read the full report from The Wall Street Journal.
www.cnbc.com/2019/06/10/kamala-harris-rejected-staff-push-for-brady-policy-in-2005-wsj.html
Harris responded to that criticism in a speech in South Carolina over the weekend.
“There have been those who have questioned my motivations, my beliefs and what I have done,” Harris said. “But my mother used to say, you don’t let people tell you who you are. You tell them who you are. So that’s what I’m gonna do.”
A Harris spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment from CNBC. Her campaign told the Journal, “It took too long to implement, but I am proud we implemented a Brady policy in the D.A.‘s office that was later called ‘a model for other jurisdictions.’”
Read the full report from The Wall Street Journal.
www.cnbc.com/2019/06/10/kamala-harris-rejected-staff-push-for-brady-policy-in-2005-wsj.html
Kamala Harris condoned and supported the use of falsified videos and other evidence to incriminate a citizen of a crime. That is antithetical to American ideals; the Rule of Law and is a tyrannical abuse of power.
|
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/gtheneric/Feature_Homepage_TheOathWeTake.htm On January 3, 2017 Kamala Harris swore the oath as a U.S. Senator that she would support and defend the Constitution of the United States while bearing true faith and allegiance to the Constitution. Based upon Senator Kamala Harris' actions in advocating the deliberate violation of the United States Constitution by police officers she lied to Congress. |
From March 2008 through December 2008 the Palo Alto Police destroyed exculpatory evidence and submitted falsified evidence to the Santa Clara DA in order to incriminate a citizen of a crime. When the DA realized what occurred the DA covered up the crimes of the PAPD yet continued to prosecute the citizen by knowingly using false/perjurious statement by the police officers.
From 2008 through December 2015 the California Attorney General's office was informed of all the evidence proving the allegations. The statute of limitations of the crimes ran through December 2011, Harris was informed numerous times from day she took office in January of 2011 of the evidence. Harris had 11 months to file charges against the culpable officers yet Attorney General Kamala Harris decided that no crimes occurred. However the evidence provided to her overwhelmingly contradicts her findings. Additionally the culpable police officers extended the statute of limitations to March 2014 when they submitted the falsified evidence to the federal court in March of 2011.
|
Kamala Harris was provided an independent forensic report verifying that the taser videos were falsified.
Kamala Harris was provided evidence that:
ONE:
The MAV videos have been edited and falsified:
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-10.html
https://sccrimelab.weebly.com/one.html
TWO:
The two taser cameras which recorded the incident were sent to Taser International and destroyed;
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-7.html
THREE:
The PAPD acknowledged destroying a taser cartridge, taser probes, blast doors and AFIDS;
The PAPD acknowledged that four taser probes were fired from two separate taser guns; two probes from each gun however the video footage of the second taser firing is missing from the MAV videos and the Taser video from the taser gun that fired the taser probes;
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-5.html
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/pc-135.html
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/pc-135--141-b.html
FOUR
The PAPD falsely presented the crime scene by removing the taser cartridge, taser probes, blast doors and AFIDS, which is a violation of CA PC 141(b);
https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/afanasiev.html
https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/powers.html
FIVE
Two officers from the PAPD knowingly provided false testimony during a court proceeding;
https://sccrimelab.weebly.com/nine.html
https://sccrimelab.weebly.com/seven.html
SIX
The PAPD falsified the taser gun activation data and submitted that data to federal court;
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-6.html
SEVEN
How the Santa Clara District Attorney concealed the crimes of the Palo Alto Police;
https://jeffrosenda.weebly.com/da-cover-up.html
There is a lot more evidence that implicates the DA and others but this is more than sufficient to prove the allegations to Kamala Harris.
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/
============================================================================================
============================================================================================
============================================================================================
Here is a PDF file containing confirmation of the evidence sent to Kamala Harris when she was Attorney General of California:
|
Here are some responses from Kamala Harris' Office
|
Here is Kamala Harris' official response:
engler.pdf | |
File Size: | 1801 kb |
File Type: |
Here is the evidence that former Attorney General Eric Holder and possibly former President Barack Obama obstructed justice:
|