Why did Senator Kamala Harris condone the use of falsified videos to incriminate a citizen of a crime and then cover up that crime commit ed by police officers against that citizen?
She did so because she believes some citizens do not deserve "Equal Protection of the Law" as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. The reason why she believes that some people do not deserve equal protection of the law is because she has deemed than as inferior human beings to herself and her colleagues. If it is not this reason than what else can it be? |
You have to hate American citizens and America itself to use false evidence to incriminate someone of a crime. Senator Harris violated and subverted the U.S. Constitution and her oath of office.
Should Senator Harris be the Vice President of the United States? No. Not only should she be disqualified for being the vice president but she should be removed from office. Had President Trump committed the acts that Senator Harris committed the U.S. Senate would remove him from office. If Congress, the Senate, would remove Trump than the Senate must expel Senator Harris. |
Senator Kamala Harris Lied to Congress
Kamala Harris condoned and supported the use of falsified videos and other evidence to incriminate a citizen of a crime. That is antithetical to American ideals; the Rule of Law and is a tyrannical abuse of power.
|
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/gtheneric/Feature_Homepage_TheOathWeTake.htm On January 3, 2017 Kamala Harris swore the oath as a U.S. Senator that she would support and defend the Constitution of the United States while bearing true faith and allegiance to the Constitution. Based upon Senator Kamala Harris' actions in advocating the deliberate violation of the United States Constitution by police officers she lied to Congress. |
From March 2008 through December 2008 the Palo Alto Police destroyed exculpatory evidence and submitted falsified evidence to the Santa Clara DA in order to incriminate a citizen of a crime. When the DA realized what occurred the DA covered up the crimes of the PAPD yet continued to prosecute the citizen by knowingly using false/perjurious statement by the police officers.
From 2008 through December 2015 the California Attorney General's office was informed of all the evidence proving the allegations. The statute of limitations of the crimes ran through December 2011, Harris was informed numerous times from day she took office in January of 2011 of the evidence. Harris had 11 months to file charges against the culpable officers yet Attorney General Kamala Harris decided that no crimes occurred. However the evidence provided to her overwhelmingly contradicts her findings. Additionally the culpable police officers extended the statute of limitations to March 2014 when they submitted the falsified evidence to the federal court in March of 2011.
|
Kamala Harris was provided an independent forensic report verifying that the taser videos were falsified.
Kamala Harris was provided evidence that:
ONE:
The MAV videos have been edited and falsified:
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-10.html
https://sccrimelab.weebly.com/one.html
TWO:
The two taser cameras which recorded the incident were sent to Taser International and destroyed;
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-7.html
THREE:
The PAPD acknowledged destroying a taser cartridge, taser probes, blast doors and AFIDS;
The PAPD acknowledged that four taser probes were fired from two separate taser guns; two probes from each gun however the video footage of the second taser firing is missing from the MAV videos and the Taser video from the taser gun that fired the taser probes;
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-5.html
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/pc-135.html
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/pc-135--141-b.html
FOUR
The PAPD falsely presented the crime scene by removing the taser cartridge, taser probes, blast doors and AFIDS, which is a violation of CA PC 141(b);
https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/afanasiev.html
https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/powers.html
FIVE
Two officers from the PAPD knowingly provided false testimony during a court proceeding;
https://sccrimelab.weebly.com/nine.html
https://sccrimelab.weebly.com/seven.html
SIX
The PAPD falsified the taser gun activation data and submitted that data to federal court;
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit-6.html
SEVEN
How the Santa Clara District Attorney concealed the crimes of the Palo Alto Police;
https://jeffrosenda.weebly.com/da-cover-up.html
There is a lot more evidence that implicates the DA and others but this is more than sufficient to prove the allegations to Kamala Harris.
https://chiefburns.weebly.com/
============================================================================================
============================================================================================
============================================================================================
Here is a PDF file containing confirmation of the evidence sent to Kamala Harris when she was Attorney General of California:
|
Here are some responses from Kamala Harris' Office
|
Here is Kamala Harris' official response:
engler.pdf | |
File Size: | 1801 kb |
File Type: |
Here is the evidence that former Attorney General Eric Holder and possibly former President Barack Obama obstructed justice:
|